The Dining Philosophers problem is a classic synchronization and concurrency problem used to illustrate challenges in resource allocation and deadlock avoidance. It's often framed as a thought experiment involving philosophers sitting around a dining table, where they alternate between thinking and eating. To eat, a philosopher needs two forks (one on their left and one on their right), but there are only as many forks as there are philosophers.
Problem Statement:
There are N philosophers sitting at a circular dining table.
Each philosopher alternates between two activities: thinking and eating.
To eat, a philosopher needs two forks (one for each hand).
Forks are placed between philosophers, and there is one fork between each pair of adjacent philosophers.
The challenge in the Dining Philosophers problem is to design a synchronization solution that ensures:
Mutual Exclusion: Only one philosopher can pick up a fork (use a resource) at a time.
Deadlock Avoidance: Philosophers must not enter into a state where they all are waiting for a fork indefinitely.
Common Deadlock Scenario:
If every philosopher picks up their left fork simultaneously, they all will be waiting for their right fork, leading to a deadlock.
We must use some methods to avoid Deadlock and make the solution work :
a. Allow at most 4 ph. To be sitting simultaneously.
b. Allow a ph. To pick up his fork only if both forks are available and to do this, he must pick them up in a critical section (atomically).
c. Odd-even rule. an odd ph. Picks up first his left fork and then his right fork, whereas an even ph. Picks up his right fork then his left fork.
Solutions to the Dining Philosophers Problem:
There are several solutions to the Dining Philosophers problem, each with its own approach to achieving mutual exclusion and deadlock avoidance. Two common solutions are the "Mutex and Condition Variables" solution and the "Semaphore" solution.
Mutex and Condition Variables Solution:
Each fork is represented by a mutex lock.
Philosophers follow a set of rules:
They can only pick up both forks (locks) if both are available.
If one fork is not available, they release any fork they've picked up and wait.
They use condition variables to signal when a fork is available.
This solution ensures mutual exclusion and avoids deadlock by allowing philosophers to release forks and wait if they can't get both forks at once.
Semaphore Solution:
Forks are represented by semaphores with an initial count of 1.
Philosophers use semaphores for synchronization.
They try to acquire both the left and right forks (semaphores) using sem_wait (wait) operations.
If they can't acquire both forks, they release any fork(s) they've acquired using sem_post (signal) operations.
Philosophers release the forks after eating using sem_post.
This solution also ensures mutual exclusion and deadlock avoidance by allowing philosophers to release forks if they can't acquire both, and they use semaphores to synchronize their actions.
Both solutions ensure that philosophers can eat without causing conflicts or deadlocks. The choice of solution may depend on the programming environment and the specific requirements of the problem.
Last updated